limjunying

Posts Tagged ‘recycling’

e-Waste Expected to Plateau by 2015

In recycling on May 12, 2009 at 9:25 pm

dump e-waste sorted photo
Photo via Jaymi Heimbuch

According to a study by Pike Research called “Electronics Recycling and E-Waste Issues,” the amount of e-waste heading to landfills should start to level by 2015

Pike Research expects that in 2015, our e-waste volume will peak at about 73 million metric tons, and decline after that, due to government regualtions on proper e-waste recycling, industries going green to coax consumers, as well as consumer awareness and demand that pressures industries to make their products more recyclable in the first place.

Managing Director, Clint Wheelock

“On the positive side, the European Union has established a strong regulatory framework with its WEEE and RoHS directives, serving as an example for similar initiatives worldwide. Many leading electronics manufacturers and service providers are also strong exemplars of what corporate social responsibility can achieve – in Pike Research’s analysis, this list of leading companies includes Cisco, Dell, HP, Motorola, Nokia, Research In Motion, Sprint Nextel, and Vodafone.”

It’s also safe to hazard a guess that by that time, companies will have figured out that the materials inside old gadgets are highly valuable for making new gadgets, and will perhaps be putting in place better programs for collection and reuse. This may make economic sense as the price of recycling goes down with increased demand and load, hence making it more economically viable for companies to reuse recycled materials in newer product lines.

An Executive Summary of the report is available for free download on the firm’s website.

Via Green Tech

New Battery Technology Improves MacBook Pro Battery Life by 60%

In green technology on January 7, 2009 at 2:20 pm

Source: “New Battery Technology Improves MacBook Pro Battery Life by 60%“, treehugger.com, Jaymi Heimbuch, 6th Jan 2009

macbook pro new battery technology slid photo
Photo via Gizmodo

New battery technology in the 17″ MacBook Pro was shown off at MacWorld today, which lays claim to a battery life improvement of 60%. The new battery can last up to 8 hours on a charge, and can be charged 1,000 times, equivalent to about 5 years. It’s also recyclable at the end of it’s life. But there are even more green features to this new technology.

Apple made a block of batteries, rather than the usual cylindrical cells that end up wasting space. The newly utilized space allows the notebook to have a 40% bigger battery, without making the notebook bigger. The problem, of course, is that you have to take the notebook apart if you want to replace the battery. 

But the upside is that it will last three times longer than the industry standard. The trick for making it last longer is using a chip within the battery that communicates with each cell to make adjustments to the current for each cell. This means a maximized battery life.

With it lasting so much longer, and being recyclable at the end of it’s life, that alone is enough to get Dell to hush up a bit. But additionally, Apple has a take-back program for the batteries, making recycling even easier, and it is EPEAT Gold, arsenic, BFR, mercury, PVC free, and touts 34% smaller packaging.

Via Gizmodo Live Blogging at MacWorld

More on Apple
Apple’s Mac Brick Rumors and the Environmental Impact
Apple Recycles iPods, Computers, All Brands of Cell Phones
New Apple Macbook & Macbook Pro has Greener Energy Saver Icon
Steve Jobs: New Apple Nano iPods to be Greener

Intel Launches Less-Toxic Halogen-Free Xeon CPUs

In green technology, recycling on September 14, 2008 at 11:31 pm

Intel Xeon 45nm CPU image

Halogen-Free CPUs
Chip-maker Intel has announced that is has started shipping four halogen-free Xeon processors (series 5200 and 5400). The chips are functionally the same as the previous versions, and they are drop-in compatible.

What’s Wrong With Halogens?
Halogens might not sound that bad because we’re familiar with the word (all those lamps), but the Halogen family includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine. “Halogens are highly reactive, and as such can be harmful or lethal to biological organisms in sufficient quantities.” Now, we’re not saying that your CPU is dangerous to you (don’t try too eat it, though), but over the manufacturing of millions of them, it adds up to a lot of halogens. Removing them will no doubt make electronics recycling safer.

Intel Clean Room photo

Availability
From Intel’s release:

A number of systems vendors are supporting these new processors including Asus, Dell, Fujitsu, Fujitsu-Siemens, Gigabyte, HP, IBM, Microstar, NEC, Quanta, Rackable Systems Inc., Sun Microsystems, Supermicro, Tyan and Verari Systems. The new 5400 series processors are available now, while the X5270 will be available this fall.

We hope that this means that Intel will transition its whole line of chips soon, and since Intel is the 800 lbs gorilla in its industry, competitors will probably follow its lead.

Via Intel

Other Green Initiatives by Intel
Intel’s Next CPU To Include Dedicated ‘Power Control Unit’ to Save Power
Intel Shows Wireless Electricity System at IDF
TH Interview: More on Intel’s Renewable Energy Purchase
Intel: Now Largest Purchaser of Green Power in U.S.

Source:

“Intel Launches Less Toxic Halogen-Free Xeon CPUs”, treehugger.com. Science & Technology, Michael Graham Richard, 12th Sept 2008

 

Paper Bags or Plastic Bags? Everything You Need to Know

In environment on August 3, 2008 at 6:30 pm

by Colin Dunn on 9th July 2008 for treehugger.com

Paper or plastic bags: which is better?
It’s an age old question, when it comes time to check out when grocery shopping:paper bag or plastic bag? It seems like it should be an easy choice, but there’s an incredible number of details and inputs hidden in each bag. From durability and reusability to life cycle costs, there’s a lot more to each bag than meet the eye. Let’s take a look behind the bags.

Where do brown paper bags come from?
Paper comes from trees — lots and lots of trees. The logging industry, influenced by companies like Weyerhaeuser and Kimberly-Clark, is huge, and the process to get that paper bag to the grocery store is long, sordid and exacts a heavy toll on the planet. First, the trees are found, marked and felled in a process that all too often involves clear-cutting, resulting in massive habitat destruction and long-term ecological damage.

Mega-machinery comes in to remove the logs from what used to be forest, either by logging trucks or even helicopters in more remote areas. This machinery requires fossil fuel to operate and roads to drive on, and, when done unsustainably, logging even a small area has a large impact on the entire ecological chain in surrounding areas.

making-paper-bags-wood-pulp-mill-photo.jpg
Part way between trees and paper bags. Photo credit: Sally A. Morgan—Ecoscene/Corbis

Once the trees are collected, they must dry at least three years before they can be used. More machinery is used to strip the bark, which is then chipped into one-inch squares and cooked under tremendous heat and pressure. This wood stew is then “digested,” with a chemical mixture of limestone and acid, and after several hours of cooking, what was once wood becomes pulp. It takes approximately three tons of wood chips to make one ton of pulp.

The pulp is then washed and bleached; both stages require thousands of gallons of clean water. Coloring is added to more water, and is then combined in a ratio of 1 part pulp to 400 parts water, to make paper. The pulp/water mixture is dumped into a web of bronze wires, and the water showers through, leaving the pulp, which, in turn, is rolled into paper.

Whew! And that’s just to make the paper; don’t forget about the energy inputs — chemical, electrical, and fossil fuel-based — used to transport the raw material, turn the paper into a bag and then transport the finished paper bag all over the world.

paper-recycling-piles-photo.jpg
Paper recycling plants, like the one shown above, is the best place for bags to go when you’re done with them.

Where do paper shopping bags go when you’re done with them?
When you’re done using paper shopping bags, for shopping or other household reuses, a couple of things can happen. If minimally-inked (or printed with soy or other veggie-based inks) they can be composted; otherwise, they can be recycled in most mixed-paper recycling schemes, or they can be thrown away (which is not something we recommend).

If you compost them, the bags break down and go from paper to a rich soil nutrient over a period of a couple of months; if you throw them away, they’ll eventually break down of the period of many, many years (and without the handy benefits that compost can provide). If you choose the recycle paper bags, then things get a little tricky.

The paper must first be re-pulped, which usually requires a chemical process involving compounds like hydrogen peroxide, sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide, which bleach and separate the pulp fibers. The fibers are then cleaned and screened to be sure they’re free of anything that would contaminate the paper-making process, and are then washed to remove any leftover ink before being pressed and rolled into paper, as before.

How are plastic bags made?
Unlike paper bags, plastic bags are typically made from oil, a non-renewable resource. Plastics are a by-product of the oil-refining process, accounting for about four percent of oil production around the globe. The biggest energy input is from the plastic bag creation process is electricity, which, in this country, comes from coal-burning power plants at least half of the time; the process requires enough juice to heat the oil up to 750 degrees Fahrenheit, where it can be separated into its various components and molded into polymers. Plastic bags most often come from one of the five types of polymers — polyethylene — in its low-density form (LDPE), which is also known as #4 plastic.

recycling-plastic-bags-plastic-waste-photo.jpg

How does plastic bag recycling work?
Like paper, plastic can be recycled, but it isn’t simple or easy. Recycling involves essentially re-melting the bags and re-casting the plastic, though, according to the U.S. EPA, manufacturing new plastic from recycled plastic requires two-thirds of the energy used in virgin plastic manufacturing. But, as any chef who has ever tried to re-heat a Hollondaise sauce will tell you, the quality isn’t quite as good the second time around; the polymer chains often separate break (thanks to reader MaryBeth for noting the difference between “separate” and “break” — the former implies that the chains can come back together, which they can’t), leading to a lower-quality product.

What does that mean to you? Basically, plastic is often downcycled — that is, the material loses viability and/or value in the process of recycling — into less functional forms, making it hard to make new plastic bags out of old plastic bags.

biodegradable-plastic-bags-photo.jpg

What about biodegradable plastic bags?
Biodegradable plastic is a mixed bag (pun intended) as well; while biopolymers like polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and Polylactide (PLA) are completely biodegradable in compost (and very, very, very slowly — if at all — in a landfill) and are not made from petroleum products, they are often derived from our food sources.

The primary feedstock for bioplastics today is corn, which is rife with agro-political conflict and often grown and harvested unsustainably; because of these reasons, and because it competes with food supply, it is not likely to be a long-term solution in the plastics world.

Plus, some bags marked “biodegradable” are not actually so — they’re recycled plastic mixed with cornstarch. The cornstarch biodegrades and the plastic breaks down into tiny little pieces but does not actually “biodegrade,” leaving a yucky polymer mess (if in small pieces). The only way to avoid this? Look for 100% plant-based polymers, like the two mentioned above.

So, while it’s good to have the alternative (and to recognize the innovation it represents), bioplastics aren’t quite ready to save us from the paper or plastic debate.

paper-shopping-brown-bags-shopping-cart-groceries-photo.jpg
Paper bags hold more stuff, but plastic bags use less energy during production and recycling. Photo: Getty Images

Paper or plastic: A look at the facts and numbers
Further insight into the implications of using and recycling each kind of bag can be gained from looking at overall energy, emissions, and other life cycle-related costs of production and recycling. According to a life cycle analysis by Franklin Associates, Ltd, [pdf] plastic bags create fewer airborne emissions and require less energy during the life cycle of both types of bags per 10,000 equivalent uses — plastic creates 9.1 cubic pounds of solid waste vs. 45.8 cubic pounds for paper; plastic creates 17.9 pounds of atmospheric emissions vs. 64.2 pounds for paper; plastic creates 1.8 pounds of waterborne waste vs. 31.2 pounds for paper.

Paper bags can hold more stuff per bag — anywhere from 50 percent to 400 percent more, depending on how they’re packed, since they hold more volume and are sturdier. The numbers here assume that each paper bag holds 50 percent more than each plastic bag, meaning that it takes one and half plastic bags to equal a paper bag — it’s not a one-to-one comparison, even though plastic still comes out ahead.

It’s important to note that all of the above numbers assume that none of the bags are recycled, which adds a lot of negative impacts for both the paper and plastic bags; the numbers decrease in size (and the relative impacts decrease) as more bags are recycled. Interestingly, the numbers for paper bag recycling get better faster — the more that are recycled, the lower their overall environmental impact — but, because plastic bags use much less to begin with, they still ends up creating less solid and waterborne waste and airborne emissions.

Paper and plastic bags’ required energy inputs
From the same analysis, we learn that plastic also has lower energy requirements — these numbers are expressed in millions of British thermal units (Btus) per 10,000 bags, again at 1.5 plastic bags for every one paper bag. Plastic bags require 9.7 million Btus, vs. 16.3 for paper bags at zero percent recycling; even at 100% recycling rates, plastic bags still require less — 7.0 to paper’s 9.1. What does that mean to me and you? Plastic bags just take less energy to create, which is significant because so much of our energy comes from dirty sources like coal and petroleum.

i-am-not-a-plastic-bag-anya-hindmarch-photo.jpg
The best way to go? A reusable bag, not a plastic bag. Anya Hindmarch’s wildly popular “I am Not a Plastic Bag” tote is helping give the reusable bag some sex appeal.

Paper bags or plastic bags: the conclusion
Both paper and plastic bags require lots and lots of resources and energy, and proper recycling requires due diligence from both consumer and municipal waste collector or private recycling company, so there are a lot of variables that can lead to low recycling rates.

Ultimately, neither paper nor plastic bags are the best choice; we think choosing reusable canvas bags instead is the way to go. From an energy standpoint, according to this Australian study, canvas bags are 14 times better than plastic bags and 39 times better than paper bags, assuming that canvas bags get a good workout and are used 500 times during their life cycle. Happy shopping!

Plastic bags are getting banned more and more. Read on in TreeHugger…
TreeHugger Picks: Ban the Bag
IKEA Bans Plastic Bags for Good
China Launches Crackdown on Plastic Bags
China’s Plastic Bag Ban is Working, So Far
San Francisco To Ban Plastic Shopping Bags
Whole Foods Bans the Bag
Bag Ban Phase 2: All Retail Stores
Wait for Us! Australia Wants to Ban Plastic Bags Too
Ban or No Ban: The Debate over Plastic Bags in LA (UPDATED)

More about reusable bags and shopping bags
Q&A: Retail Carry Bags – Paper or Plastic?
I’m Not an Ethical Plastic Bag
Anya Hindmarch’s Carrier Bag
The Mini Maxi Shopper: the Reusable Bag you won’t Forget
Reusable Shopping Bag Madness in Australia
Bring Your Own: Reusable Bags , Cups & More
Minimalist/Modernist Reusable Tote Bags
Bags of Change: Carrot Better Than Stick

Disclaimer:

This is not my work, I’m merely disseminating must-read info. I also must say Colin did a very great job with this article. I might put my time into writing articles of this exhaustiveness, detail and length. Not until I’m out of National Service though.

Brother Announces First Island-Wide Recycling Campaign In Conjunction with World Environment Day

In Uncategorized on June 7, 2008 at 9:16 am

 

Consumers can soon return used Brother Ink Cartridges via SingPost for recycling

Brother International Singapore, today reiterated its commitment to going green with the introduction of a new programme to facilitate the return and recycling of used Brother ink cartridges island-wide. In conjunction with World Environment, this first-of-its-kind initiative allows Brother’s customers to conveniently return their used ink cartridges via SingPost mailboxes, over a business reply service.

Developed with customers’ ease-of-use in mind, they can simply collect customised envelopes from selected Brother authorised resellers across the island, as well as Brother Customer Service Centre, from 23 June 2008 onwards. The envelopes are Reply Paid, and can also be mailed to the customers upon request to the Customer Service department or on Brother’s website (www.brother.com.sg/recycling).

The packages can then be dropped off at any SingPost mailbox island-wide. Not only will this provide environmentally conscious customers with greater convenience in returning their used ink cartridges, Brother hopes that the move will encourage other customers to adopt the same habit as well.

In line with the theme of conservation, Brother encourages customers to consolidate a maximum of four ink cartridges per package before mailing them back.

“The recycling of ink cartridges via SingPost mail service is the first-of-its-kind initiative amongst printer manufacturers in Singapore and we are very excited to be the pioneers. We are always looking for ways to encourage our customers to do their bit for the environment and given the convenience this programme offers, we hope to encourage more customers to jump on the recycling bandwagon,” said Takeo Shimazu, Managing Director, Brother International Singapore. 

Said Howard Shaw, Executive Director, Singapore Environment Council, “This recycling initiative by Brother is a perfect example of good product stewardship and demonstrates how manufacturers can take on an active role in making environmental protection an integral part of the product life cycle, from the design stage right to disposal. I applaud Brother’s efforts and encourage more companies to follow suit.”

This new programme follows the launch of the Brother Green Project last month, which aims to provide customers with an easy and convenient way of disposing used Brother consumables in a socially and environmentally responsible way.

As part of the initiative, collection points have been set up at Brother’s Customer Service Centre at #01-01 Gateway East for consumers to dispose of their used ink, toners and drum cartridges which will then be recycled. Collection points have also been created at selected authorised resellers’ outlets including Brother’s Concept Store at #04-K1 Funan, DigitalLife Mall, as well as at Skylet at #04-54/55/56 Sim Lim Square. In addition, Brother International Singapore also runs a programme for its corporate customers where used toners and drums for recycling are collected regularly from corporate customers’ offices.

To further encourage the recycling of consumables, Brother will also be running marketing programmes where consumers can stand the chance to win prizes. Details of these programmes will be posted on Brother’s website (www.brother.com.sg/recycling ) on 23 June 2008.

Source:

Hardware Zone Latest Annoucements

 

In Spite Of Reduce And Reuse, Hong Kong’s Plastic Passion Barely Dented

In Uncategorized on May 27, 2008 at 6:49 pm

by April Streeter, Gothenburg, Sweden on 05.26.08 for treehugger.com

Hong Kong Harbor image
Hong Kong’s 7 million citizens use about 3 bags each each day. (Photo tboothhk @ flickr)

In Hong Kong, long known as a shopper’s paradise, everything you buy is swathed in plastic – plastic wrap covers each cucumber, and if you buy the cucumber you’ll probably get offered another plastic bag to put it in. Plastic is so ubiquitous to daily life here that it’s no surprise that 23 million bags get thrown away each day – 8.3 billion for the government to dispose of annually. Last year Hong Kong placed a levy on bags, and it is estimated that by this summer 1 billion fewer bags will be passed out, slightly slowing the filling of Hong Kong’s dumps, which are estimated to reach capacity well within a decade.

There is a noticeable difference in the streets compared to a year or two ago – many more citizens are carrying cloth or at the very least some sort of reusable-looking bag, and at the upscale City Super grocery, customers are offered a panoply of chic reusable bags to purchase. However, shop keepers still seem uniformly surprised when you say, “No bag” at purchase, and Hong Kong lags behind its neighbor Taiwan, which has cut plastic bag use around 80 percent since 2002. Hong Kong’s China parent is banning giving out free plastic bags starting next week. Ultra-thin plastic bags (less than .0025 millimeters) will be banned outright from that date – the country is hoping to save about 37 million barrels of oil from the ban.

More Information:

 Handbag Hysteria Hits Hong Kong, and China Launches Crackdown On Plastic Bags

My Input:

A very good start. Many domestic conveniences are surprisingly carbon disasters. Irresponsible, misinformed, ill-informed, ignorant consumerism is one of the greatest contributors of anthropogenic carbon. In fact, you could argue it to be the source of all anthropogenic carbon, for all aspects of human lifestyle can be inevitably traced to the satiation of human needs. For example, foods. Food wastage leads to a real water wastage, that is, the water that was used to grow those crops, for sustain those animals. Some kinds of textile, cotton for example, required water to grow. Plastic bags require fossil fuels to manufacture. So is almost everything, to your computer, your speakers, your mouse etc. A huge percentage of energy use would ultimately come from fossil fuel power generation.

As such, it is rather blatant, that not only should there be government pressure on industries to be more carbon-neutral, in the form of CCS or renewable sources or higher efficiencies, there should ALSO be a responsibility at the level of the individual’s lifestyle to reduce the demand for energy in the first place. Buy only what you need. That’s the best start. Even if you were to buy the next iPod, or a digital camera, find out how to recycle it when you’re done with it. Or perhaps, keep it in a good condition for second-hand resale. Many companies are increasingly allowing a recollection of old products for recycling.

If you feel guilty with such hedonistic pleasures, but would still like the comforts of 21st Century living, then save the energy in different places. Turn off appliances when not in use. Pluck out the plugs from the sockets to reduce energy leakage. Stop keeping your computer or other appliances on sleep mode or low power mode. The list is ENDLESS.

 

Feel free to ask me by leaving a comment. I’ll get back to you ASAP.

Does Recycling Plastic Cost More Than Making It?

In Uncategorized on May 9, 2008 at 12:38 pm

In 1967, Mr. McGuire had one piece of career advice for young Benjamin Braddock — plastics. Indeed. In the 40 years since “The Graduate,” plastic has exploded in applications, from car bumpers to computers, and it has been classified into seven types, including PET #1, the type used for plastic water and soda bottles. Now the looming question is what to do with all that plastic. Of the 2.7 million tons of plastic PET bottles on U.S. shelves in 2006, four-fifths went to landfills.

Setting aside environmental concerns, the economic success or failure of plastics recycling relies on two variables: the cost of the raw materials used to make virgin plastic, petroleum and natural gas, and the cost of recycling versus the cost of disposal, which fluctuates based on a city’s proximity to recycling centers and the price to dump in local landfills. A University of California, Berkeley study estimated that areas like Los Angeles and San Francisco could gain an economic benefit of $200 a ton for recycling instead of dumping. Nonetheless, the cost of recycling a bottle versus making a new one simply varies, depending where the bottle is and what the capricious price of oil happens to be.

Each year, 29 billion plastic water bottles are produced for use in the United States, according to the Earth Policy Institute, an environmental organization in Washington, D.C. Manufacturing them requires the equivalent of 17 million barrels of crude oil, so rising oil and natural gas prices have only exacerbated the high price of virgin plastic. “Plastics News,” a trade magazine, lists the recent price of PET virgin bottle resin pellets between 83 and 85 cents a pound, compared to only 58 to 66 cents a pound for PET recycled pellets.

Yet escalating plastic prices have done little to curb demand. The amount of PET plastic on U.S. shelves has more than doubled in the last decade, according to the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR). The increase is a result of the surging demand for bottled water. In 2005, seven and a half billion gallons of water flooded U.S. shelves – roughly equivalent to the average amount of water that flows over Niagara Falls in three hours. That’s 21 times more bottled water than the amount available on shelves in 1976, according to U.S. government data.

All that extra plastic, and the petroleum used to make it, is expensive. NAPCOR estimates that 5.5 billion pounds of PET bottles and jars passed over U.S. shelves in 2006. Making this many PET bottles and jars today from virgin plastic would cost $4.5 billion just for the raw materials, without considering the cost of operating bottle production plants.

Prior to its reincarnation as industrial carpet or sleeping bag stuffing, a plastic bottle in the recycle bin has a long journey ahead of it. First it goes to a collection facility to be inspected for contaminants like rock or glass. Then it is washed and chopped into flakes. The flakes are dried and melted into plastic lava, which is filtered for impurities and formed into strands. Finally, the strands are cooled in water and chopped into pellets that can go to market.

Landfills, however, are the final resting place for most bottles. Ostensibly this is the cheaper option. But landfill tipping fees, the dumping tariffs levied to offset the cost of creating, maintaining and closing a landfill, can be quite expensive compared to recycling. This is especially true in densely populated areas like the East Coast or areas like Florida with shallow water tables. In fact, fees can run from $10 a ton to over $100, according to Jerry Powell, editor of the trade publication “Plastics Recycling Update.” Additionally, dumping wastes a valuable commodity: In 2005, about half a billion dollars worth of PET bottles went to landfills, according to the Container Recycling Institute, a non-profit organization.

Rising plastic prices have forced some companies that bottle their product, like Coca-Cola, to think twice about using expensive virgin plastic resin. Now they are working to make more lightweight bottles that contain more recycled resin, Powell explained. Bottles made with thinner plastic use 30 percent less resin and rely on the water or liquid inside to maintain their shape. Using less resin per bottle could translate to a savings on raw materials of about $1.5 billion a year for the bottling industry. Powell thinks it’s a positive step for business and the environment. “That’s what we need,” he remarked. “Less plastic. Not just recycling.”

This answer is provided by Scienceline, a project of New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.